The Better Targeted Super Concessions Bill has not been scheduled for debate in the Senate next week, creating doubt as to whether it will be passed by the end of the ...
A parent who cared for their ill adult child has not been deemed a death benefit dependent in a private binding ruling
A successor director has more strategic and practical advantages than an alternate director in an SMSF corporate trustee ...
The ATO is advising SMSF trustees not to use their funds to buy Christmas presents or pay for bills. The regulator ...
Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning
SubscribeLabor’s latest round of superannuation reform proposals target high-income earners and are a departure from the government’s legislation currently before federal Parliament, foreshadowing an inevitable round of inadvertent compliance blunders.
Shadow Treasurer Chris Bowen said earlier this week that Labor is proposing that the annual non-concessional contributions cap be lowered to $75,000 and the high-income superannuation contribution threshold be lowered to $200,000.
Labor is also opposed to the Turnbull government’s proposals for catch-up contribution and tax deductibility for personal superannuation contributions.
Argyle Lawyers principal lawyer Peter Bobbin said there “will always be fallout” resulting from changes to contribution limits because many people do not keep up with the changes, make errors with their payments and breach the NCC as a result.
“Every time they do this, it undermines significantly the confidence that the Australian public have in superannuation,” Mr Bobbin told SMSF Adviser.
“Having said that, I understand where they’re coming ... they’re just saying, ‘Well, it should be a pillar for retirement policy but it also shouldn’t be a big tax haven’.”
The SMSF Owners’ Alliance criticised Labor’s announcement, saying a further reduction in the non-concessional allowance will affect small business people who plan to sell their business and boost their retirement savings and home owners who plan to downsize and put the proceeds into super.
“Faced with the prospect, in retirement, of the new tax on superannuation earnings above a $1.6 million balance cap and re-imposition of capital gains tax on assets above the cap, people planning to sell their house and downsize may change their plans,” SMSF Owners’ Alliance executive director Duncan Fairweather.
“The more superannuation is taxed and limited, in contrast to a tax-free house, the more likely it is that people approaching retirement will decide to stay put. By not releasing their house to the market, they will constrain supply and maintain the upward pressure on housing prices.”
Mr Fairweather said the proposed forms for super were all “part of the plan by both major parties to slice away the benefits of superannuation under the pretext of ‘fairness’ to try to repair the budget mess they have created”.
The Financial Services Council also voiced its concerns. FSC chief executive Sally Loane said Labor’s plan to take a package of additional superannuation taxes to the next federal election would cause further uncertainty.
“Australians want certainty and confidence in superannuation,” Ms Loane said.
“More than anything they want political parties to draw a line in the sand under changes to the tax treatment of super so they can plan confidently for their financial futures.”
Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.
Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.