Login
Holding costs on vacant land a no-go for SMSF
Powered by
MOMENTUM
MEDIA
There has been an overwhelmingly positive response from the SMSF sector to the draft regulations for Treasury Laws Amendment (Self-managed superannuation funds—legacy ...
SMSF establishments are expected to exceed 30,000 for FY24 – the first time since the transfer balance cap was ...
Big four accounting firms EY, PwC and several other accounting firms have been selected as finalists at the inaugural ...
Over 70 per cent of SMSFs are not benefiting from access to professional financial advice, according to a new report
Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning
Subscribe
Where problems are perceived to exist with the SMSF sector, it is important that policy decisions are based on reality and hard facts, not ideology and hearsay.
The seemingly inexorable rise of self-managed funds is the most striking dynamic of Australia’s superannuation system. More so because the rise of self-managed superannuation has been driven by the choice and determination of individuals rather than by government policy direction.
Self-managed funds are the only funds realising the vision set for Australia’s superannuation system: to enable people to make themselves financially independent in retirement and avoid reliance on the age pension.
Generally, SMSF members are achieving this goal while the members of the large industry and retail funds are not. The average balance in a self-managed fund account is over $500,000 compared with average account balances in industry and retail funds of less than $30,000.
The higher balances in SMSFs result from people maximising their concessional and non-concessional contributions and from the returns generated by their assets. Yet self-managed superannuation is not just for the higher paid; ATO statistics show that 66 per cent of SMSF members are on incomes of less than $80,000.
Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter.
