These cases concerned the thoroughness at which auditors look at the underlying investments made by the super fund, he said.

“Next year, advisers and trustees will be required to provide more thorough and comprehensive information to auditors so that they’re satisfied that the fund has made an investment which is recoverable,” Mr Colley said.

“That’s really important, because if the auditor is not satisfied or they can’t see that it’s recoverable, then they’ll likely qualify the accounts of the fund, fill out a contravention report and let the ATO work out whether the investment is recoverable under the operation of the SIS legislation.”

Mr Colley said that a lot of practitioners and trustees probably aren’t aware that more complicated SMSF investments such as related party arrangements or syndicate arrangements, where it’s difficult to determine the underlying assets, may require more work in terms of justifying the investment to the auditor.

“We’re already starting to see auditors become much more thorough in what they’re doing. We recently had one auditor that wanted a feasibility study from a developer concerning a land development arrangement that the superannuation fund was going to enter into,” he said.

Some SMSF auditors may also potentially become pickier about which SMSF clients they will provide audits for.

“Some may want an easier life and decided not to take on funds with [these types of] investments because of the extra difficulty,” he said.

“Or they may continue to take on those arrangements, but they’ll be more likely to qualify the accounts and bring it to the attention of the commissioner if the liquidity or recoverability of the investment is difficult to determine.”