You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Property firm hit for false super claims

news
By Nick Bendel and Katarina Taurian
January 29 2015
1 minute read
5 View Comments

The director of Consumer Affairs Victoria has accepted an enforceable undertaking from a property investment company that made false claims related to investing in a superannuation fund.

Earlier this month, Consumer Affairs announced that it had accepted an enforceable undertaking from Melbourne-based Accrue Property.

Consumer Affairs found that Accrue made several false or misleading statements on its website.

==
==

One of these claims was that the company could show investors how to use their super funds to “earn an outstanding return, regardless of market conditions or whether capital growth occurs”. 

It also claimed the Accrue Landbanking system could turn an investor’s super fund into a “goldmine – to purchase an appreciating asset, without taking a cent out of your own pocket”.

Accrue must now advise current or prospective customers that “no return is ever guaranteed” in relation to investing in property and investing through an SMSF.

The company has also agreed to remove all false or misleading claims from its website and to submit to a two-year compliance program to ensure all company statements comply with Australian Consumer Law.

Accrue has also agreed to pay $5,000 to the Victorian Consumer Law Fund.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

Comments (5)

  • avatar
    Yes, and I'm sure the $5,000 fine is going to deter further incidents. How is that a fine? Speeding fines are almost larger, this is a corporation advertising intentional falsehoods to make money. The fine should reflect the profit they derived from making the false claims. As Damian mentioned, an individual Financial Planner would lose their entire livelihood. Yet a corporation gets fined the equivalent of lunch money! Why?
    0
  • avatar
    Bewildered Industry Observer Thursday, 29 January 2015
    Where is ASIC!!!
    0
  • avatar
    Damian makes a valid point. The scrutiny appears aimed more to the Financial Planning Industry and as such, is it not therefore probable that operators outside of this Industry participating in non-compliant activity being overlooked due to unequal focus?
    0
  • avatar
    And if a Financial Planner made such statements we would be banned. These people need to be subject to the same standards as the Financial Planning Industry.
    0
  • avatar
    'Accrue has also agreed to pay $5,000 to the Victorian Consumer Law Fund.'

    WOW!
    0
avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as