ASFA stated that this appears to come from a Treasury publication which it said “is not based on actual levels of age pension take-up in the community”.

ASFA chief executive Dr Martin Fahy said the take-up for the age pension had been coming down as more people accrue significant superannuation balances and more also work past the age of 65.

“In 1997, the take-up rate for the age pension and the age-related veterans’ pension was 79 per cent. This fell to 75 per cent by 2007 and is now around 70 per cent,” he said.

In the paper ASFA also argued that superannuation was having a positive impact on more recent retirees.

“Around 22 per cent of people aged 65 and over have superannuation as their main source of income,” the paper said.

“The number of people aged 65 to 69 relying primarily on superannuation has increased markedly by nearly 35 per cent in two years. At the same time, the number of people in that age group relying primarily on the age pension has fallen for men by around 4 per cent and has increased by only 3 per cent for women.”

ASFA also slammed comments made by the Grattan Institute in 2015 that stated that superannuation accounts for only 15 per cent of wealth for most households.

“Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) figures prepared especially for ASFA, indicate that superannuation is the major financial asset of retiree households and also of households before retirement,” said ASFA.

“The ABS data indicates that for households with the head aged 15 to 64, superannuation is the most commonly held asset apart from bank accounts and motor vehicles. Other assets, apart from owner-occupied property, are held by only a relatively small proportion of households.”

Sign up for the launch of Accountants Daily Live – a free webcast for accounting professionals! Click here for more information.