You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Misuse of SMSF funds sees adviser convicted

news
By mbrownlee
June 19 2018
1 minute read
9 View Comments
financial adviser, convicted, caution tape
expand image

After a history of non-compliance, a former financial adviser has been convicted for engaging in dishonest conduct with investor funds, including money from SMSFs.

In a public statement, ASIC stated that former financial adviser Gabriel Nakhl has been convicted in the District Court of New South Wales on 8 June 2018 on eight charges brought by ASIC of engaging in dishonest conduct with investor funds.

Mr Nakhl, of Illawong, NSW, pleaded guilty to being knowingly engaged in dishonest conduct in relation to 12 investors, ASIC said.

==
==

ASIC stated the conduct occurred between March 2009 and March 2011 when Mr Nakhl was an authorised representative of Australian Financial Services Limited, now in liquidation, and from about March 2011 to about September 2013 when he was the sole director of SydFA Pty Ltd, now in liquidation.

In November 2013, ASIC accepted an enforceable undertaking from Mr Nakhl after it identified concerns that Mr Nakhl gave unauthorised financial product advice and gave financial product advice without a reasonable basis.

The investigation also found that Mr Nakhl made false and misleading statements and engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, including making statements about the returns clients could expect and the risks of the investments he promoted.

“Specifically, Mr Nakhl advised some clients, including those in self-managed superannuation funds, to advance money to him so that he could invest it in a high-interest rate account on their behalf and pay them a fixed return,” ASIC said in an earlier statement.

“ASIC is concerned Mr Nakhl instead spent the money, among other things, on his private sports car and motorbike hire business and himself.”

ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell said Mr Nakhl “breached the trust many investors placed in him”.

“Setting up an SMSF is one of the most significant steps an investor can take, and where an individual or company’s conduct unlawfully puts that investment at risk, ASIC will take action.”

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: miranda.brownlee@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (9)

  • avatar
    He will be sentenced in March next year
    0
  • avatar
    How much prison time did Mr Nakhl receive for his dishonest dealings and thefts?
    0
  • avatar
    About time the spotlight was turned to Accountants, who permit early access to SMSF fund by clients then fudge the minutes to cover it up. Example the son of an accountant takes $286,000 out of his SMSF age circa 45, a pilot so he could complete his luxury home renovations, dad the accountant, said it was just a mistake, mum put the money into the sons SMSF to balance the ledger, problem was this happen 5 years apart so the audit was deliberately changed to cover this up. Secon example: SMSF Trustee take $110,000 out of SMSF to "spend" auditor deliberately fudged the minutes on the orders of the accountant because this was missed by the accountant, the accountant paid the $110,000 into the clients SMSF to avoid a legal battle. and so it goes on
    0
    • avatar
      I am not sure where you have sourced your examples. Certainly not anything I have seen in providing 25 years of SMSF administration services - true independence between accountant/ administrator and auditor is the key.
      0
    • avatar
      So we have an article highlighting criminal behaviour by a financial planner and a rant about some unidentified accountant and auditors. Seems like deflection to me.

      Have you any proof of your allegations?
      0
  • avatar
    Hi George, as one of SMSF clients that did my homework into the company before I invested over 1.2 million, who at the time had no previous red flags, and believed when I stated that I wanted my capitol protected that it would be. I find your comment rather offensive.
    0
  • avatar
    ... and still breath...
    0
  • avatar
    looks like a good result for the regulator
    0
  • avatar
    Thanks for the good laugh: a great way to start the day. I can't decide who is more gullible, ASIC or the SMSF clients. Is ASIC serious about an "undertaking"? Does a leopard ever change its spots? A crook will always be a crook. The crook would have laughed at ASIC and the undertaking he gave. Not worth the paper it was written on. And as for the SMSF people giving money to the bloke? it defies belief. Can anyone be so monumentally, industrial strength, dumb?
    0
avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as