You have2 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 2 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

SMSF advice failures found in high-profile adviser’s review

news
By mbrownlee
October 12 2018
1 minute read
6 View Comments
Sam Henderson review
expand image

The Financial Planning Association’s disciplinary panel has handed down a determination on Sam Henderson, determining that he failed to consider the personal circumstances and objectives of a client when recommending an SMSF.

The Financial Planning Association of Australia’s independent disciplinary body, the Conduct Review Commission, found that Sam Henderson of Henderson Maxwell, breached the FPA’s Code of Professional Practice (FPA Code), determining that nine out of the ten alleged breaches could be proven.

Sam Henderson was forced to address the royal commission earlier this year following advice he gave to a client to roll money from a public service fund to an SMSF, which would have incurred a potential loss of $500,000.

==
==

The FPA first received a complaint about the statement of advice provided by Sam Henderson on 6 March 2017.

The Conduct Review Commission found that in recommending the establishment of an SMSF for the complainant, the member failed to consider strategies relevant to the complainant’s current situation and that could reasonably meet her needs and objectives.

The FPA contented that the SOA did not contain any consideration of the complainant’s existing superannuation arrangements.

“It was further submitted that there was no contemporaneous evidence that the member analysed in any meaningful way the complainant’s existing arrangements,” the determination stated.

The FPA also found that the recommendation to set up an SMSF was unsuitable for the complainant.

The panel said that is was satisfied that there was a breach where Mr Henderson failed to compare the performance and costs of the SMSF with the client’s existing strategy or products.

It was also found that Mr Henderson did not place the clients’ interests first or provide professional service objectively.

“No entities that were not associated with the member were recommended, although this is not clear in respect of recommended property purchases,” the determination stated.

“There was no evidence whatsoever of sufficient – or any - consideration being given to any alternatives, or about how the conflicts apparent in the advice in the SOA would be managed.

The FPA said information in relation to sanctions will be released in due course.

 

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: miranda.brownlee@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (6)

  • avatar
    Grant Abbott, CEO I Love SMSF Monday, 15 October 2018
    It is imperative that the FPA and the SMSF Association audit and assess their member's files on a random basis as SMSF Trustees and would be members assume that their membership meets the highest standards held out by these Associations. How many audits and how many actions are taken by these Associations against inappropriate advice by members. Bad advisers need to be weeded out not ignored.
    0
    • avatar
      Well said quality assurance reviews are a must for both the FPA and regulator. Nothing spurs compliance other than knowing you may be reviewed.
      0
  • avatar
    Retired CFP & SSA Monday, 15 October 2018
    And what did the FPA do with my complaint against and FPA Fellow? Buried it stating the adviser was to be provided natural justice, whatever the hell that means?
    0
  • avatar
    Gate. Horse. Bolted.
    Ah yes, and 'Embarrassing'.
    0
  • avatar
    Far out. It's a close run photo finish between ASIC & the FPA to determine who is the best for shutting the gate after the horse has bolted!!
    0
  • avatar
    Bit late FPA, when you have clearly been cought with your pants down and completely failing to respond to this complaint in a timely or proper manner.
    So after 18 mths of trying to hide this case and only after the RC has shown the FPA’s codes and processes to be completely useless, do you come out and do something.
    What a complete farce.
    Where are the Ethics FPA?
    ALL FPA executives and managers must be made to do FASEA and do Ethics courses plus more training.
    0
avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as