Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Royal Commission report makes super fee recommendations

news
By mbrownlee
February 04 2019
1 minute read
6 View Comments

The final Royal Commission report has recommended banning advice fees from MySuper accounts, limiting fees for choice accounts and prohibiting the unsolicited sale or offer of super products.

In his final report for the Royal Commission, Commissioner Kenneth Hayne has recommended an outright ban on the deduction of advice fees from MySuper accounts and limitations on the deduction of advice fees from choice accounts. You can access the final report here. 

“Deduction of any advice fee, other than for intra-fund advice, from superannuation accounts other than MySuper accounts should be prohibited unless the requirements about annual renewal, prior written identification of service and provision of the client’s express written authority in connection with ongoing fee arrangements are met,” the report stated.

==
==

Grandfathering provisions for conflicted remuneration, it said, should be repealed as soon as is reasonably practicable.

The report has also called for the hawking of superannuation products to be prohibited.

“That is, the unsolicited offer or sale of superannuation should be prohibited except to those who are not retail clients and except for offers made under an eligible employee share scheme,” it said.

“The law should be amended to make clear that contact with a person during which one kind of product is offered is unsolicited unless the person attended the meeting, made or received the telephone call, or initiated the contact for the express purpose of inquiring about, discussing or entering into negotiations in relation to the offer of that kind of product.”

The report said that a person to whom an unsolicited offer is made will “very often not be in a position to judge the merit of what is offered”.

“In particular, that person will seldom if ever be in a position to compare what he or she is offered with what he or she already has under some existing superannuation arrangement,” it said.

“That is why the attempts by ANZ and CBA to sell superannuation in bank branches under a ‘general advice’ model may have contravened the law.”

The report also recommended stapling a person to a single default account in order to eliminate multiple accounts.

It also called for tougher penalties for breach of covenants and obligations from trustees of APRA-regulated funds.

“Breach of the trustee’s covenants set out in section 52 or obligations set out in section 29VN, or the director’s covenants set out in section 52A or obligations set out in section 29VO of the SIS Act should be enforceable by action for civil penalty,” it said.

It also said that the roles of ASIC and APRA in relation to superannuation should be adjusted.

 

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: miranda.brownlee@momentummedia.com.au