You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Document witnessing, property advice flagged as major focus areas for ASIC

money
By mbrownlee
March 14 2019
1 minute read
2 View Comments
ASIC
expand image

With ASIC ramping up its attention on financial advice recently, an industry law firm has urged SMSF advisers to revise their practices in certain areas, particularly with document witnessing for binding nominations.

Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers partners Clinton Jackson and Scott Hay-Bartlem said that, following the royal commission and some of the behaviours emerging from it, ASIC has been cracking down on the financial planning industry, with a particular focus on certain areas.

Speaking at the Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers Annual Adviser Training Day and SMSF Conference, Mr Jackson said that one of the areas ASIC has been looking at is financial planners who have been witnessing documents, in particular binding nominations for super funds, when they weren’t actually there.

==
==

“There were a few situations where [advisers] were going back to the office and getting someone else in their office to be the second witness on a document, and obviously they weren’t there when the client signed,” he said.

Advisers need to be really careful that they’re not doing things like that, he said, which will draw attention from ASIC. They need to make sure they've got all the records on their end.

“What we tend to do when we witness these documents is have both parties in the room and also make a file note to say that, independently, I was there and I witnessed that and Scott would do the same thing,” he said.

“That way, if anyone comes to ask, there’s something contemporaneous that Scott signed saying, yes, he was there and there’s something that I did as well. So, just makes sure we cover off on that issue.”

Mr Hay-Bartlem said that the fact that property spruiking is still a big concern means that ASIC is also paying greater attention to licensing in general.

“There are concerns about spruikers getting individuals into a room and signing them up for contracts through to LRBAs and SMSFs and then settlement,” he said.

“So, ASIC is looking at this licensing area in terms of what advisers are doing and what property spruikers are doing.”

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: miranda.brownlee@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (2)

  • avatar
    If we're going to pursue property spruikers let's make sure we include the myriad of licensed advisers only offering new/ off the plan properties as the 'best' strategy for their victims, I mean, clients.
    0
  • avatar
    I'd suggest they look at the unlicensed advisers in the property spruiking area but I'm not ASIC so they will continue to ignore it.
    0
avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as