“In terms of what ‘as soon as practicable’ is, the examples on the ATO website are around six months, but we’ve seen ones that go on a lot longer, particularly if they’ve got assets that are tricky to sell in order to pay out the benefit,” Mr McBirnie said.

The fund would also need to report the commencement of any new death benefit pension as a TBAR event at the date of commencement, he added.

If the benefit was being paid as a pension, close attention would need to be paid to the cashing requirements, although there was some room to move if the fund did not meet these within a single financial year. This meant funds would not need to cash out the benefit if a mistake was made, Accurium head of technical services Melanie Dunn said.

“As long as the payment standards are again met in the following financial year, the cashing requirements of the death benefit can continue to be met if the fund commences a new death benefit income stream the following year,” Ms Dunn said.

“[But] it means any payments that were made in the year the death benefit income stream didn’t meet the pension standard would be lump sum, and that may lead to a contravention of the SIS requirements.

“So, you’ll lose your ECPI, but you can recommence that income stream as a death benefit income stream without the need to cash it out as a lump sum.”