Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Indexation uncertainty creating conundrums with contributions

news
By mbrownlee
November 10 2020
1 minute read
Indexation uncertainty creating conundrums with contributions
expand image

SMSF professionals should consider the potential for the contribution caps and transfer balance cap to be indexed next year when advising clients on bring-forward strategies, says a technical expert.

Heffron managing director Meg Heffron said it won’t be clear what the transfer balance cap and contributions caps will be for 2021–22 income year in terms of indexation until around February next year.

Speaking at the SMSF Adviser Technical Strategy Masterclass, Ms Heffron said the contribution caps and the transfer balance cap are indexed to two different things.

==
==

“I’ve very deliberately said that it might not be, because they’re actually indexed to two different things. The contribution caps are indexed to average weekly earnings and the transfer balance cap is indexed to the consumer price index, so they could both be indexed next year, neither of them next year or one next year and one the year after. We won’t know till around February,” she said.

Ms Heffron said this uncertainty can make certain types of planning difficult, such as whether to utilise the bring-forward rules.

“It’s difficult to know whether you want to do a bring-forward this year. We know exactly what the thresholds were at 30 June 2020, but if you lock one in this year, and the cap does get indexed, then effectively you’re locking in three years to do $300,000 in non-concessional contributions, rather than three years to do $330,000,” she cautioned.

“You won’t get the rest of the increase once you’ve already locked the bring-forward in.”

Any movement in the transfer balance cap threshold could also impact strategies for clients, she added.

“You might have a client who’s just over $1.4 million at the moment and you say to them, ‘Sorry, you can’t do a three-year bring-forward. You can do a two-year one though, so maybe we’ll do that.’ But what if the transfer balance cap gets indexed next year?” she questioned.

“[In that case], the threshold they’re assessed against won’t be $1.4 million, it will be $1.48 million, and so maybe if they wait till next year, they could do a three-year bring-forward.”

SMSF professionals will need to work through the maths with some of these scenarios once there is more clarity around indexation next year, Ms Heffron said.

SMSF professionals should also be aware of what happens where the transfer balance cap increases during a bring-forward.

“Let’s say we’ve started a bring-forward now and the transfer balance cap increased in the future. If the client had a higher total super balance and had only been able to lock in a two-year bring-forward but next year the cap goes up and now it looks like they could do a three-year bring-forward, can they reset things? Unfortunately, no — once you’re locked in, you’re locked in till your time period ends,” she explained.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: miranda.brownlee@momentummedia.com.au