Between 21 August 2014 and 30 June 2018, Aware FS charged approximately 25,300 customers a total of $50 million in fees for advice services included as part of the superannuation product offered by Aware FS, which at that time was also a superannuation trustee, according to ASIC.

“The firm provided at least 17,500 customers with written disclosure documents advising them that they would receive an annual financial planning review called an Annual Review Service. Another 7,800 customers entered into ongoing advice service arrangements that included provision of an Annual Review Service. However, Aware FS did not provide the promised services,” ASIC said.

The court found that by charging fees for no service and failing to have internal procedures, measures and controls in place to monitor compliance, Aware FS also breached its obligations as an Australian Financial Services licence holder to act efficiently, honestly and fairly and to comply with financial services laws.

The court also ordered that Aware FS publish an adverse publicity notice on its website for one year.

In handing down his ex tempore decision, Justice Moshinsky concluded that Aware FS’ conduct was serious and systematic, with thousands of similar contraventions having occurred repeatedly over an extended period of time.

His honour also highlighted the large number of Aware FS customers affected by this misconduct and noted that remediation of $105 million for this and related conduct had been paid. 

ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court stated that Aware FS charged fees to tens of thousands of customers for financial services it had grounds to believe it would not be able to provide.

“As a result, over $50 million in fees was charged to customers who have nothing to show for it,” said Ms Court.

“Financial services providers should treat the penalty imposed today as an important reminder to maintain robust internal controls and compliance systems. Firms are responsible for ensuring they only charge consumers for services they provide. If they fail in this obligation, they face significant penalties.”