The Cooper Review in 2010 set the way for significant change in the superannuation industry and this is certainly what has occupied copious amounts of times both for me and for other industry stakeholders. Advocating, negotiating and consulting on the necessary legislation and then implementing the many changes were a high priority for many years.

Even with the current government’s 'hands-off' superannuation commitment, there has still been plenty of work to do, including reviews of the governance of super, the Financial System Inquiry (FSI), Budget submissions, working with regulators etc. To be clear, I do not question the validity or necessity of this work in this stage of the super industry’s evolution.

Throughout much of the processes in recent years, however, there has been little commitment or work done to create a set of objectives for our retirement income system.

This is what I see as a priority for myself this year – to encourage, promote and advocate for the development of a long-term set of objectives for our retirement incomes system (only objectives for superannuation were suggested in the FSI report).

It concerns me greatly that further changes will occur without any clear line of sight about what we want and need the system to look like in the long term. We know that constant tinkering has significantly undermined the confidence of many Australians in the super system.

How do we want our super system to interact with the aged pension? Do we accept heavy reliance on the aged pension, or in 50 years' time, do we want most Australians to be largely self-reliant in their retirement?

When the objectives are clear, it will become much easier to assess the merit of further change against this. Without a clear set of objectives, how do we know we are heading in the right direction?

Have I got it right or do you think my focus should be elsewhere? Have your say below.

Liz Westover, head of superannuation, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand.