Non-lapsing BDBNs (again) - confirmation that there is no debate
The recent decision on Hill v Zuda Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 21 has confirmed that regulation 6.17A has no application to an SMSF.
Up-to-date, specialised strategy is core component of an SMSF professional’s arsenal. SMSF Adviser analyses and interprets regulatory and legislative changes to ensure the SMSF sector is kept informed on the tips, tools and best practice for serving SMSF trustees.
The recent decision on Hill v Zuda Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 21 has confirmed that regulation 6.17A has no application to an SMSF.
The recent case of Papadam v Smidam Pty Limited [2022] NSWSC 629 serves as an important illustration of what happens when members of an SMSF ...
What the extension of the ATO's transitional compliance approach in PCG 2020/5 means for SMSF professionals.
The predicted ongoing increases in interest rates have sent shivers down the spines of many SMSF trustees, but should they be concerned
A recent decision confirms the longstanding position that superannuation is not an asset of the estate.
If the relationship between SMSF members falls apart, seeking to remove a member from the fund can prove difficult and expensive
The law in relation to who is an employee or independent contractor has developed over many years both here in Australia and overseas
The ‘notional estate’ rules that apply in New South Wales, provide that in certain circumstances assets or estates that have a connection to ...
Many SMSF professionals are finding out just how difficult it is to sail the rough waters of SuperStream. Unfortunately, the forecast is not ...
Recent legislation imposing a foreign investor land tax surcharge in Tasmania may have implications for certain SMSFs.